slowly. Camera-people are asked to leave. The judge enters and the trial is set. Lára (the state prosecutor) brings forward new files from the police with “fingerprints and photos”. The defendants had asked that all files would be presented before the trials and that finally happened. Ragnar (the lawyer of the defendants) also presents evidence. [...]
Trial
Examination of witnesses
The first defendant Ragnheidur. Lára (L): What was the purpose of entering the parliament? Ragnheidur (R): To be heard L: To disturb? R: No L: Where were you when you decided to enter the parliament? R: I came from home L: Did you know that people were planning to go inside? R: No L: Did [...]
Jón Benedikt Hólm
Prosecutor: I’m going to start with asking you about purpose? J: I was going to make the MPs happy, they were so sad. P: Where were you when you took the decision? J: Downtown P: Did you hear of this before? J: No, not especially P: Were you in a group or alone? J: I [...]
Kolbeinn Aðalsteinsson
Prosecutor: what was the purpose? K: trying to make ones views known, to be heard P: Was the purpose to disturb work? K: It‘s maybe possible to call it that, that option was at least open, that disturbance on the work in parliment could happen, one realizes that. P: How did you take a decision? [...]
Snorri Páll
Prosecutor: I want to ask what was the purpose of going inside? Snorri: I choose to not answer. P: Where were you? Snorri: I choose to not answer. P: Did you take a desicion alone, or was there a meeting or group of people? Snorri: I choose to not answer. P: Was there a prior [...]
Sólveig Anna Jónsdóttir
The prosecutor, Lára (L): What was the purpose? Sólveig Anna (SA): I choose to not answer that question L: Was there in your opinion any disturbance? SA: I choose to not answer that question The same goes for other questions regarding organization or if there had been any planning prior to entering the building. L: [...]
Teitur Arsaelsson
[Lára]: What was the purpose of entering the parliament? [T]: Protesting [L]: What was the nature of the protest – to disturb MP´s during work? [T]: No, the purpose was not doing something [L]: Where were you when you made this decision? [T]: I choose not to answer [L]: Was it preplanned? [T]: I hadn´t [...]
Steinunn Gunnlaugsdóttir
chooses not to answer the prosecutor’s questions. “I choose not to answer” is her answer to all questions. When the prosecutor asks about this alleged meeting Steinunn says that it does not concern the prosecutor or anyone in court what she does in her own time. She claims not to recognize herself on the video. [...]
Andri Leó
(AL) was next to the “witness podium” Lára the prosecutor asks: What was the purpose of the visit? AL: I’m not commenting on that, just like the thousands of people that were present on Austurvöllur those days. L: Where were you when you decided to participate? AL: I took a decision to listen to speeches [...]
Thor Sigurdsson
Thor is the last defendant to be called in today. [Lara, the prosecutor]: What was the purpose? [Thor]: No comment. I´m not answering any further questions from the prosecutor. Thor gives no comment to several questions from the prosecutor. [L]: Did the people have a preplanned role before entering the parliament? [T]: Not that I [...]
Witness examinations I: Steinar Kr. Sigurðsson and Brynjar Nikulás Benediktson
Examinations of witnesses start again: People fill the courtroom again. The prosecutor and defender seem to have been able to get hold of a number of witnesses, and the examination will continue to half past three this afternoon. First to bear witness is Steinar Kr. Sigurðsson Steinar answers questions of the defense: Were you in [...]
Witness examination II: Guðfinna Gísladóttir and Guðlaugur Ágústsson
Next witness is Gudfinna Gisladottir, parliament guard: She describes her entrance on the scene, saying that there was alot of people that became very loud. [Prosecutor]: Did you give any orders? [G]: I talked to them, because I didn´t believe my own eyes, what they were doing – I tried to stop them and tried [...]
Witness examinations III:
Next witness is Kjartan Egilsson, a police officer working at the parliament (KE): Prosecutor: How were you involved? KE: I was on duty in the hall when I heard noises. Kjartan says that the guards clenched arms and thereby closing off for people to get in. There was a lot of pressure. He does not [...]
Witness examinations IV
Kristinn Pedersen, a police officer in the parliament Pedersen says he was upstairs at the public benches when he heard a call on the radio, which had then been ripped of him. He had looked out the window and saw that every one had covered their face. They had decided to “go easy on these [...]
Witness examinations V
Witness: Maria Ditas, parliamentary guard The prosecutor [P] asks about her role as a parliamentary guard. Ditas says her role is to keep the peace in the parliament house, get people to turn of their cell phones, leave their bags and notify people of the rules to enter the benches. This has to happen in [...]
Witness examinations VI
Witness: Vilhjálmur Jónsson (J), parliament guard. The prosecutor asks Jónsson about his role as a parliament guard, what security protocol there is etc. His answer is similar to the other guards’, take guests overcoats, ask them to turn of cellphones. He says that people do let people in in small groups, like one or two [...]
Witness examinations VII
Witness: Þormóður Sveinsson, parliament guard The prosecutor asks about the role of parliament guards. Sveinsson answers that it is to make sure that parliament meetings can proceed in order. He says that usually 26 people are let into the benches at once, and that the door downstairs is always kept locked. He claims that he [...]
Witness examinations IIX
Witness: Vigdís Jónsdóttir (VJ), assistant office manager of the parliament. Prosecutor [P]: Tell us where you were when the events took place. VJ: I was sitting next to the head of parliament inside the parliament hall, where I assist the head of parliament. P: Did you hear noises? VJ: I did not hear any noise [...]
Witness examination IX
The last witness of the day is the office manager of the parliament, Helgi Bernódusson (HB). The defense lawyer, Aðalsteinsson (D): Did the witness experience that visit, of probably 30 people? HB: Yes, I experienced it indirectly. I did not see these individual, but I was aware of them coming into the building. D: But [...]
The trial
is over today. We will continue updating the rest of the English version soon. Stay tuned tomorrow.
Today’s summary
The first day of the main proceedings is over. Before noon the accused gave their report and after lunch brake other witnesses testified. It is clear from the testimony of the defendants that they did not believe they were entering the parliament building without permission. None of them reported having attended meetings for organising prior [...]
Albert Orn Sigurdsson – police officer (A)
[Prosecutor]: Why did the police show up at the parliament? [A]: I was in a patrol car when we got a report that the building was being invaded. [P]: How was your arrival to Althingi? [A]: I was with another officer in the car, we entered through the east visitor entrance. There were “intense fights” [...]
Eirikur Valberg – police officer
[P]: Please describe your arrival on the scene on 8th of December 2008 [E]: I was working at the police station in Hafnarfjordur when they called for backup, I get there with other officers and when I arrive they have closed of the building and I was assigned to holding the public on the other [...]
Ellert Svavarsson – police officer
[Prosecutor]: Why did the police arrive at the parliament? [E]: What do you mean? [P]: Why did the police show up on the scene? [E]: Undesirable people were in the building without a permission to be at the public benches [P]: Were you one of the first on the scene? [E]: Soon (unclear) [P]: What [...]
Witness no. 4: Police Officer 0527, Guðmundur Ingi Rúnarsson
Lára: Can you Describe to the court your involvement in the protests? G: Yes, I was in the police station when we received message from the parliament. L: What was the content of the message? G: They asked all available police officers to come. Parliament was being attacked. L: How long did you take to [...]
Witness 5: Police officer nr. 0222, Jens Gunnarsson
Lára: What is your involvement in the case? Jens: There were two of us that came, that were called to the scene because of the ruckus, and when we came to the scene they had set up a police ribbon and they were moving people out. Our job was to keep the area free so [...]
Witness no. 6
Police Officer no. 0505, Guðmundur Haukur Gunnarsson L: Can you describe in a short manner your involvement in the building? GH: The parliamentary building had been closed, I recall that I only got involved in this for a short time. I don’t remember this very well. L: Do you remember going inside the house? G: [...]
Winess no. 7
police officer no. 9804, Kristján Helgi Þráinsson. Next in is police officer no. 9804, Kristján Helgi Þráinsson. Some of the people present whistle – probably because that Kristján is tall, with strong face and dark hair. Maybe someone thinks he is handsome. In any case, Kristján is both tall and muscular looking, and has been [...]
Witness no. 8
Leifur Halldórsson, Police Officer no. 0136 Lára: Can you describe your involvement? LH: We were two of us situated next to Skólabrú 2 when a call comes through the telecommunications that an urgent help was needed, it only took us a few seconds and we arrived in up to the platforms through the crowd up [...]
Witness no.9
Lúðvík Kristinsson – police officer (LK). The prosecutor (P) says she is not going to call in Kristinsson. Discussions take place on whether it is too late to cancel his testimony since he was already in the building and therefore the defense lawyers (D) got to ask him. [A call from an audience]: Do you [...]